MY UNPOPULAR OPINIONS VOL. I

Almost everything is a matter of opinion, and everyone is entitled to that no matter who, what, etc etc. It is what truly separate us at the end of the day. Here are some of my opinions that don't usually fall into the general with the majority...

WHAT OTHERS LIKE, AND I DON'T

Gotham

Initially, I was against even watching it. The story wasn't about Batman, and the lead actor was from "The OC" (sometimes we have to share the television, so we can watch all the nerd stuff we want haha) and wasn't impressed with the limited acting. I eventually submitted and tried it out, only to lost interest quickly. And if that is supposed to be The Joker, or his younger pre-clown self, I hate it haha I am thinking I felt what the Heath and Leto haters felt after seeing them and still not liking their portrayals. I however liked both, but regardless, I am not a fan of the series.

Dr. Who

I'm sorry. Just not my forte I guess....put down the gun....please?

The Walking Dead on AMC

Took me a minute to get into it and start watching. But, it didn't last long. I tried the comic books, and made watching the show even harder. Comic books didn't last long for me either, but admit part of that problem was not reading from the start. The show did have moments, but then it just felt like an endless "wait for them to die" situation. Recent events and what everyone has said has made me glad that I got out before things felt even more "over done". It is just a personal preference, but as a grown man I don't need to see death and sex in shows and movies. I am more impressed when they are able to strongly get what is happening across without actually showing anything. And even at its peak, I don't feel an extra show was needed or deserved.

WHAT OTHERS HATED, AND I LIKED

Daredevil (2003)

Again with limited exposure, but again liked it. Was it open to end amazing? No, but we were in early 2000's and were just in the beginning of getting comic book films. I will say that Affleck's hair as Matt Murdoch was ridiculous, but loved the look of the suit. It was an immediate ending to that old "wanting spandex" phase. In regards to DD that is, Bullseye needed something better than what Collin gave us. Although I am sure going sans mask was so they didn't cover his pretty face haha

Green Lantern (2011)

I should start with mentioning that I had limited exposure to Hal Jordan and the Green Lantern side of things in DC Comics. I am sure that it had helped not having the set in expectations like I do for Batman, The Joker, etc. I liked it. I thought Ryan Reynolds did an okay job with his portrayal of Hal. The costume was a bit much, but figured it would look great in a darker DC Movieverse (was still in Blue Lantern mode with that idea). I was actually disappointed that there wasn't a follow-up where we would likely see Sinestro begin his reign of fear. Speaking of which, I thought that Mark Strong nailed that one out of the park. Someone that should possibly be recast as the same character. Possibly as like many I get tired of explaining how these franchises and movieverses are all separate from each other. Who's in DC, who's in Marvel. That Batman franchise isn't connected to this one. Etc. Etc.

Star Wars Episodes I, II, & III

Most notably, Star Wars Episode III: Revenge Of The Sith. I liked seeing more Jedi and Sith as opposed to just one or two (Master and Apprentice). I was a fan of the upgraded lightsaber battles, especially between Obi Wan and Anakin in  Revenge Of The Sith. I also liked how the film seemed "brighter" adding to the effect of the darkness in Episodes IV-VI,

Just my opinion. Which is both valuable and irrelevant as again we are all entitled to our own opinions, even when they don't "fit" with the majority. There will be more in all areas that I try to cover (wrestling, games, etc.). Until then...Stay Nerdy!

For more Wrestling, Movie, Comic Book, TV Show, Video Game, and Nerd Fit stuff! Head on over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

COMIC-CON HARD TO BEAT THIS YEAR

No, unfortunately not one of the thousands lucky enough to attend this years Comic-Con in San Diego. Simply one of the millions catching the news and footage released upon the internet. One day it would be nice to be able to attend, but would it be as awesome as this year has appeared to be? The panels, signings, etc this year include some legendary greatness. Star Wars Ep. VII: The Force Awakens brought Luke, Han, and Leia aka Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, and Carrie Price to the world. Sure, they may have been in and out of Cons for years, but when was the last time they were all together, promoting a "new" movie? Even more so, when will we see this again? Hopefully for years to come, but life is always that proverbial biatch.
As a comic book nerd, this year looks amazing given the things involving Batman V Superman: Dawn Of Justice. The panels, the signings, and of course the release of the trailer. Which looks even better than the teaser that proceeded it. Personally it is the best thing to come out of this weekend. Take a look below and see why...

There is also other comic book movies making appearances this weekend. Deadpool and Suicide Squad are set to hit theaters in 2016 along side Batman V Superman: Dawn Of Justice. Then there is the television side of things with Arrow, The Flash, and Legends Of Tomorrow. That is just the tip of the iceberg really, tons of other panels, signings, appearances, and whatnot from a variety of genres in plenty of forms of entertainment.Video games, Wrestling, toys, apparel. Nerdvana would be more apt. One day. One day.


For more Movie, TV Show, Comic Book, Video Game, and Wrestling stuff! Head on over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

NGN's ALL-TIME FAVORITE COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS ON THE BIG AND SMALL SCREENS

Everyone has their own favorites, whether it is the characters, the actors who played them, or a combination the the two. Some characters have only been portrayed by one actor/actress, while the others have had different people take the helm. But, here is a list of favorite characters from both movie and television shows of the comic book genre...

Batman

Surprisingly, Ben Affleck may be the preferred choice in a years time after the teaser trailer for "Batman Versus Superman: Dawn Of Justice", but until then it is Michael Keaton. If there was a Michael Keaton and Christian Bale love child, they'd likely be tops in my books.

Wolverine

I can remember sitting on a computer in the library back when I was in high school, with very slow internet, and thinking, "Who the hell is Hugh Jackman?". This was after reading the intial report of who was chosen to play Wolverine. Of course, due to lack of films, I was always thinking pro-wrestler types should be cast as they had the look. I was young so don't pass judgement. Here we are over a decade later, and now think, "Thank god for Hugh Jackman".

Hellboy

He may be the only one to "go red", but Ron Perlman has been a perfect fit for the role of Hellboy, even though not a reader, his performance made me appreciate the character. It will be hard to see someone else play the role, but at 65 years old, Perlman won't be able to lift that right hand forever.

Superman

There are still those who may never think that Christopher Reeve can be replaced. I understand, however, Henry Cavill is my pick. He's portrayed the character very well in "Man Of Steel", with both acting ability and dedication to his physical appearance. And I am looking forward to seeing him reprise the role again, and again.

The Punisher

Dolph Lundgren gave the dark, grittier version, Thomas Jane had the budget, but Ray Stevenson is my choice thus far of those to play The Punisher. He may have had the lower budget and weaker script, Stevenson had the look and capabilities to make things work better than the rest. But, there will likely be a new Punisher, so this choice could always change. Or not.

The Joker

It is really hard to pick just one. Cesar introduced me to The Joker, Jack captivated me as a child, and Heath did the same but with me as an adult. Will go with Heath, as he did give me a rendition similar to The Joker seen in the graphic novel "Joker". Can't wait to see how Jared Leto portrays the character in "Suicide Squad".

Deadpool

Not so much the version Ryan Reynolds gave us in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine", although Reynolds did perform well pre-Weapon XI, it was what was shown in the small test footage that leaked online awhile back. And even though it is in production mode at the moment, I am thinking this will be on the list in the future anyhow.

Green Arrow

Sure, he hasn't quite "achieved" that title, but Stephen Amell has not only made me like the character, but has earned respect for what he has done with the character. If not for the success of "Arrow" their wouldn't be a "tv-verse" growing on the small screen. As well as possibly helping other networks "green light" the comic book shows they have produced since "Arrow" debuted.


There are others that could easily make the list. Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man, Chris Evans as Captain America, Tom Hiddleston as Loki, the list could go on really. But, these were the characters I enjoyed the most thus far. Always hopeful that future films and performances will alter this list of course. Looking at you, Affleck and Leto.


For more Movie, TV Show, Comic Book, Video Game, and Wrestling stuff! Head on over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

DC COMICS ROLLING DICE WITH MOVIEVERSE?

Usually a positive tone is kept around here, well there is a strong attempt to do so. And of course, one of the millions looking forward to all of this happening. However, it is hard not to "think" and "worry". Why? It's been 2 years since "Man Of Steel", and we are still a year away from "Batman VS Superman: Dawn Of Justice". That's quite a gap in between films from the same "story/universe", and that is a lot of time to think about things, and worry about what could go wrong. The main thing that crosses the thought process is this....what if "Batman VS Superman: Dawn Of Justice" flops? What will happen then?

DC Comics had put out more, and mainly better received, films in the late 70's to late 90's. That was only Batman and Superman franchises (we'll lop "Supergirl" in with her cousin since they were the same universe) though. Marvel took over after the new millennium, with their characters in more movies and DC only had Batman mainly (one shots from Supes and Green Lantern as well). Here we are in 2015, and beginning next year DC Comics movie schedule is set to explode with there being movies every year for at least the following five years or so. This has fans frothing in anticipation. Understandably, things are starting off with "Batman VS Superman: Dawn Of Justice" which has drawing power alone with just Batman versus Superman. This is where the doubt begins to creep in. The movie will also include Wonder Woman, Cyborg, Aquaman, even Lex Luthor. That is a lot of characters, and their success will effect the movies that are slated to follow. If the movie fails, what happens to the schedule? Will it remain the same, with tweeks and whatnot made along the way in making the films? Are the actors and actresses "locked in" already? Even "Suicide Squad" comes out the same year, and also holds quite a few characters, although this movies success doesn't really effect the planned movieverse, or not as much as "Batman VS Superman: Dawn Of Justice" does. Or will everything be scraped and revamped? For once that might be a longer shot of happening than usual. DC Comics (WB) appears to have invested a lot into this, and with the massive schedule, very confident. It will all depend on how well or how bad "Batman VS Superman: Dawn Of Justice" does. If we're talking "Water World" bad, then a revamp in some aspect is very possible. Hopefully there aren't any changes to the cast after the fact. Reception, scheduling, interest, etc. We don't want a Norton/Hulk thing to happen here.

With about a year to go still, everything is still in wait and see mode. And perception of how things will turn out will change as more of the film is revealed (trailer is heavily rumored to debut in "Mad Max: Fury Road" next month). It would be nice however, if people across the web would focus more on how the story and acting will be, and not an actor/actresses appearance. Okay, back to waiting...


For more Movie, TV Show, Comic Book, Video Game, and Wrestling stuff! Head on over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

MOVIE AND TV SHOW FAMILIES

Similar to the Valentine's Day article with Movie and TV Show couples, the family side of things will also have more of a nerdy focus to it. Families can consist of a lot, from blood relation, to love, and respect. A combination of all of those, or individually, each make for the foundation of a family. So, in the spirit of Canada's holiday today, Family Day, here is a short list of Movie and TV Show families...

The Queen Family

(Arrow)

It is somewhat of a tragic family with the deaths, deceptions, amongst other things. But, as is usually the case in any heroes life, and their families.

The Bennet Family

(Heroes)

At times dysfunctional, but in the end nothing but an unbreakable bond, and a father's love. Yes there is Noah and Claire, but lets not forget the "normies" of the family who protect this family is Lyle and Sandra (despite divorcing Noah).

The Potter And Weasley Family

(Harry Potter franchise)

Not your typical nerds per say, and possibly generalizing here, but Harry, Ron, Hermione, etc are a collection of outcasts, geniuses,  etc. Typical nerd and geek traits, no?

The Amell Family

(Arrow and The Flash)

Sure we mentioned The Queen's which has Stephen Amell as Oliver Queen. But, there is also his cousin, Robbie. Who just so happens to play Ronnie Raymond aka Firestorm.

Alex and Lilly

(Grandma's Boy)

Besides being a video game tester, Alex is also a creator as well. His grandma, Lily, is quite the natural born video gamer.


For more Movie, TV Show, Comic Book, Video Game, and Wrestling stuff! Head on over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

MOVIES AND TV COUPLES

There is really an endless list simply of these couples based on the fact that "love" is really the basis of any story (if you think about it). So, we'll try and focus this list on the more "nerdy" couples from across both the big and small screens. Here's our favorites...

Indiana Jones and Marion Ravenwood

(Indiana Jones And...)

Marion is a keeper for sure. She goes toe-to-toe in verbal and physical encounters, but more impressive, is her ability to drink every man under the table. She does lose some points for raising Mutt, but can't really blame her for Shia La Beouf being horrible.

Neo and Trinity

(The Matrix trilogy)

Sure, the love scenes seemed awkward, and unnecessary, but their story is quite beautiful. Neo was "the one" in more ways than one.

Clark Kent/Superman and Lois Lane

(Lois And Clark: The New Adventures Of Superman)

Easily lands atop any Comic Book Couples list (which you can find HERE actually), but this television rendition was great, despite the occasional cheese.

Sheldon Cooper and Amie Farrah Fowler

(The Big Bang Theory)

To be honest, Raj and his little pooch, Cinnamon almost made the list instead. But, that at times is a little too weird, and the dog might want to lawyer up. Joking aside, Sheldon and Amy are the poster couple for generations of awkward couples.

Han Solo and Princess Leia

(Star Wars...)

Said it would be "nerdy", and this was almost not an option if going that route.

Spock and Lt. Uhura

(Star Trek...)

Now, there is no need to war. Well, one of them.


For more Movies, TV Shows, Comic Books, Video Game, and Wrestling stuff! Head on over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

MARVEL WINNING ON BIG SCREEN? MAYBE. WHO CARES THOUGH?

There tends to be three-sides. DC Comics fans, Marvel Comics fans, and then those who like both equally. And that is for comic books, movies, television shows, and video games. Marvel fans have been boasting and claiming victory due to the success of the Avengers and how many of the comic book genre films are from Marvel. They aren't wrong, but we are here to talk about how it doesn't really matter. Television shows are better than movies. It takes a moment to stop and really think about this. And then not all will see it this way.

Sure, there are a few things about films on the big screen that we rarely, if ever, see on the small screen. Bigger budgets, bigger explosions, and usually a stronger story. And of course there are downsides to television shows. Ratings can be a real pain because if they are low, a show is in trouble and could get cancelled. Key word is "could". With television, there is room to grow and/or improve. There is a chance to make corrections on the fly and finish the season strong. Most could look to Marvel's own in, "Marvel's Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D.". The series started slightly weak, with even Marvel fans were asking "wtf". But, they turned things around and closed out the season with a really good run. With movies, the final cut is the final cut. If the film bombs, and has horrible reviews, it is less likely that there will be a follow-up film. Even a quick reboot isn't guaranteed to happen. Look at some of Marvel's early attempts on the big screen. Films like "Daredevil" and "Ghost Rider" didn't fare well at all. "Daredevil" is now about to rebooted, and "Ghost Rider" managed a sequel somehow, but failed again. DC Comics may have put out less films post-2000 (things were different before that with Marvel being barely existed and were poorly done in regards to movies), but they have less failures.
Another way that television is better than movies, is the wait time. Longest wait time in television is the "summer break". a few months of reruns before returning for weekly shows. Movies? Looking at a minimum 2 year wait time in between films. Sure there are exceptions, but not many. And although things are getting better, even today sequels and follow-ups tend to pale in comparison to its predecessor. That is a long time to wait for disappointment. Same thing could be said about TV shows, but again, able to improve on things most times.
Going with the wait time, is also the star power. Of course you will see bigger names in a movie. They get paid more in most cases. However, with films there is only a small amount of time to get both the story across and get characters into it. With comic book movies especially, there are countless characters everyone wants to see make an appearance, and even if there is say five characters that fit, it is another x-amount of time between films and even less space for new characters to appear in the next one. With television, you have an entire season with numerous shows to not only tell one larger story or a collection of smaller stories, but also more room for characters to appear. Example would be villains, with 1 or 2 in one film, then 1-2 more in the next, etc To show 5-10 villains would take 5 films and roughly ten years time. Not the case on TV, as even if they focused on a villain or two for an entire season, they can showcase the same amount of them in half the time than with movies. And not even guaranteed to get the star to reappear (ie. Bruce Banner is two different people in the "Avengers" movieverse...damn you yet thank you, Edward Norton).
Now I am sure someone is thinking about the "Phases" for building up "Avengers". But remember to stop and think about what that style is slightly imitating. Television. In a basic sense of course with each film being an episode leading up to a massive season finale. That being said, now we have "Arrow" and "The Flash" about to take things to another level on the small screen. Cross-overs between the two could make for some pure awesomeness.
Lastly, television is generally more affordable than the movies. Almost everyone has a television (almost), but not everyone goes to the movies. Especially in the age we live in where it is all digital and despite laws, easily accessible...for free.
Was hard writing this really, as I love both film and television. Perhaps it is just the DC Comics fan within that had to make a point about who is really "winning" this supposed battle between DC Comics and Marvel (I do like Marvel, just a preference for the originals right now). And even though I enjoyed "Green Lantern" it was really DC's only flop, and others being more top quality, are they really "losing"? Definitely owning the small screen with "Arrow" and new shows "The Flash", "Gotham", and "Constantine". If we add quality video games to the mix, DC Comics is beating Marvel two out of three formats. So, you can have your movies, Marvel....and keep up the good work as they are great to watch.

For more Comic Books, Movies, TV Shows, Video Games, and Wrestling stuff! Head over to Non-Geeky Nerd and check things out! Stay Nerdy!

WHAT ABOUT THE MAN OF STEEL?

Of course everyone's attention has been drawn elsewhere, but everything that is to come began with "Man Of Steel". Which of course, is a Superman movie. With the upcoming 2016 sequel looking more and more like the first installment of a Justice League movie, even with the casting of Lex Luthor we were given Alfred Pennyworth, a key Batman character. Of course, there has been talks and rumors of another villain to the mix, that may help keep this more Superman than Justice League, but even if it does everyone will be wanting to expand the team (if it hasn't already grown for MOS follow-up), drawing even more attention away from Superman.

What direction will they take? Will they keep Superman the focal point of the not only the upcoming movie but the ones that are sure to follow (if successful)? Are they simply using a "Man Of Steel" sequel as a per-cursor to a following but separate "Justice League" movie, leaving comic books original superhero to a film franchise of his own? I like to think that it will be the latter of the two, giving Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman and whomever else they add their own films that all culminate in a Justice League. It is working for Marvel as we all know, and sooner or later they end up "borrowing" from each other creatively, so why not take a sure fire route, given the writing, directing and acting are up to par of course.

Regardless of what direction that they end up taking, there are some Superman characters that have yet to appear within the new universe, that should get a cameo in the very least, if not a starring or supporting role. Some will be making their big-screen debuts, others will be returning to the silver screen partaking in the live action blockbuster(s), here's a list of characters who need to appear in upcoming Superman "Man Of Steel" films...

Jimmy Olsen

Although not a spot on replica, in some ways this is Clark Kent's "Alfred". Who else does Clark have to call his friend? True, there is Lois, but we all know there is something more to that, and of course there is Ma Kent but even the biggest momma's boy can't tell his mother everything. This is where Jimmy comes in, he adds an new aspect to add to the Last Son Of Krypton and his human side. Or to simply add a light comedic tone to an otherwise slightly darker Metropolis.

Jor El

I didn't mind Russell Crowe and his interpretation of Superman's biological father, Jor El. Crowe himself has stated that he would like to do a solo film based on the character. As intriguing as that sounds, I would settle for him reappearing within the upcoming "Man Of Steel" films. Not necessarily in large roles, but there for advice type of roles. Although small, they require an actor to give the scenes depth, otherwise it just becomes a hollow message to not only the hero, but if they chose, the audience.

Doomsday

Probably a better choice for a group effort in a "Justice League" film, but before he stars in that, Doomsday needs to face Superman mano a mano. Dealing Supes his first near death experience, before having the favor returned within the "Justice League" flick at the hands of a returning Superman. Okay, maybe just my take on "what should be" but you get the idea. This is the villain that helped take comic books back into the "mainstream" when he killed off the untouchable Superman in the 1990's. Smallville wasn't too bad considering it was a television show, this monster need the big screen treatment to truly work.

Supergirl

A lot of people were upset with the ending of "Man Of Steel", perhaps Superman is upset with himself as well, and who better to help alleviate the guilt but his cousin? Of course, he's made the promise to try and always find away to do things without killing, but he doesn't even know how to stop himself yet, so give him a break. Kara also deserves some big-screen redemption, not meaning to really knock the 1984 attempt as it was an okay effort for the time it was made in. If anything, it is another option for the female fans out there who are even more limited now then we were pre-2000.

Kryptonite

Okay, it isn't a character per say. Not unless it is put inside a character (Kryptonite Man, Metallo, etc), but regardless of who and how, it needs to make an appearance within this movie universe. How else are they going to make Superman vulnerable at times. which are needed because he loses people when he is "too perfect". We know the hero is going to succeed in almost every outcome, they are highly likely to live on and give us more movies. It is the vulnerabilities that cast that little bit of doubt that keeps it interesting. They hinted at it with the needing to adapt to both Earths and Kryptons environments, but those are overcome simply by adapting to it over time. The traditional route or a new Government made version of the pieces of rock that make the Man Of Steel humble.


There are other characters of course, specifically Metallo (mentioned in "Kryptonite"), but this is the tip of the ice berg. It was reassuring having Lex Luthor finally cast, keeping this on a Superman route. Seems Henry Cavill's Superman is slightly in the background of what he helped make happen, which was delivering in the role and having fans actually wanting this sequel before there was even a whisper of Batman being involved in all of this. Something that was difficult to achieve with fans still fixed on the late, great Christoher Reeve and his iconic interpretation of Superman. Hopefully this list will be given reason to grow and evolve as I am hoping to be able to do with so far the Batman and Wonder Woman characters hopefully getting solo spin-offs.

Stay Nerdy!

IS FOX SITTING ON A MUTANT GOLDMINE?

As much as I love the X-Men, in the movie universes, they are second to the Avengers Universe. Quality (production), promotion and box-office numbers. And that is okay, the lighter Avengers Universe needs a darker contrasting one and that can occur with the X-Men over at FOX. I am looking forward to the upcoming "Days Of Future Past" and it's follow-up "Age Of Apocalypse", but I see them as opportunities to expand their universe with solo and team-up spin-off films. There is even an opportunity to do something similar to what the Avengers Universe is doing in regards to "Age Of Ultron", and hinting at "Infinity Gauntlet". None of the movies about to be listed need to have really big budgets, they need good writing, directing and acting. The CGI or added effects don't need to be over-the-top grande in most of these cases. So if they "failed" they wouldn't take too much of a hit. I think some or most would work out if they had the right pieces in place like mentioned before with acting, etc.

Some are obvious to their fan bases, some are rumored to be almost ready to shoot or have been for years, some are "just my opinion" and one is the next best thing to "X-Men Vs Avengers" or "Infinity Gauntlet". Here's a list of movies FOX should start taking the Marvel Studios route with...

Deadpool

They gave us a taste in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine", and has been rumored to be getting his own solo flick for years now. With the current events happening within the X-Men films, it would be a great opportunity to re-cast and give a new taste of Deadpool, before branching out into his own solo venture. Rumored problem has been the rating, as he would require an "R" or higher. Putting him within the X-Universe gives an opportunity to show him in a ratings friendly way, so to also introduce those who aren't aware of him (there are some). Why not put him in the next one...

X-Force

All this time-travel stuff screams "Cable" and when I think of him, I think of "X-Force". They're giving us "Bishop" thankfully through this events of "Days Of Future Past", but also giving us "Warpath", a X-Force alumni, which provokes wanting this to happen. It is also a good point to launch a "X-Force" appearance before leading to a spin-off. Perhaps a more dark and more adult orientated form of the X-Men. Of course, we'd include Deadpool within all of this, either as a member of an antagonizing enemy before spinning off into his own. Once "X-Force" is established then "Cable" could teleport into his own solo films. If not in the upcoming "Days Of Future Past", but would like to see it stem from the follow-up "Age Of Apocalypse". With the political events in both X-2 and X-3, would've also been an opportune time to launch this team as the anti-Gov't mutants aka the grey area between X-Men and Magneto's Brotherhood.

X-Factor

Having X-Men, X-Force and X-Factor all building up to a larger movie, let's say "X-Tinction Agenda", could add too it all. Big part of the success over in the Avengers movies is that they all connect to each other. These three teams were all different with the mutant aspect being what joined them, so a build up to a grande finale with a common enemy uniting them despite indefferences, could mean big money. If not, then simply move on to another "story arc". But, with so many mutants to cover, it is hard to show them all, as well as continue to use what has worked. Multiple teams could help with this, and simply take what characters have worked for each to make the joint venture. X-Factor also covers the Gov't connection while X-Force is the anti-establishment, and X-Men being an even blend.

X-Men & Fantastic 4

I am not sure how anything related to the "Infinity Gauntlet" could be done with out characters from both of these, and that may not happen when the time comes and Thanos becomes more than just a teaser at the end. FOX should at least attempt to combine these two teams themselves before one day Marvel Studio's is able to do so themselves. There is going to be two different "Quicksilver" characters after-all. Not too sure where villains land in terms of owning rights, and Apocalypse seemingly already being a lock, if the soon-to-be rebooted "Fantastic 4" doesn't begin with him, perhaps they team-up to face Galactus. Or the gods agree to allow Spider-Man into this mix and we have FOX's version of a "Secret War" of sorts.

Solo Spin-Offs

Again, there are so many mutants, and each have their own fan base. Similar to "Deadpool" characters like "Gambit" have also been rumored to be getting their own solo adventures. If not the "team" route, then some solo movies could also build up to a giant team-up (worked for Avengers). Could have "Gambit" and "Deadpool" like mentioned, as well "Cable", a team-up with "Cyclops & Jean Grey", even a "Summers Brothers" movie that includes "Mr. Sinister"? List is endless, and depends on personal preference as to who should get their own movie. But, that is kind of the point, FOX could be cashing in like they are over at Marvel Studio's. Whether it was directly within the story or by simple guest-spots by one or two characters in each film, they can all be "connected" leading to a grand finale.


Endless possibilities as the X-Men are a massive chunk of the character catalog of Marvel Comics. And seems that although we've had 6, soon to be 8 X-Films, it seems as though there could be "more". I know not everyone wants to, and it doesn't necessarily mean things will be a success. However, it has helped that every year there is 1-2 of the Avengers related movies out every year, with the Blu-Ray/DVD/Digital releases filling the gaps in between. Announcing that there is already a follow-up to "Days Of Future Past" is a step in a good direction, but again, give us more than just a single X-Men team and Wolvie being the only solo-flick recipient.

Stay Nerdy!

CHILL!!!!!! TOP 5 GOOD THINGS ABOUT..."Batman & Robin(1997)"

I honestly try to be positive, key word is try. It's hard at times, but I am sure it is just as hard to make a good movie. We live in a world where people are chomping at the bit to be negative about something before giving it a shot (ie. Batfleck), and then, even when the negativity is almost justified, that is all it becomes, negative.

So, here is an attempt to pick out positive things from movies that were considered failures. Shouldn't be too hard, as most of the movies I plan on covering I actually like (stay tuned for "Green Lantern (2011)").

Batman & Robin (1997)

5) Mr. Freeze's Suit/Armor
Visually it looked pretty badass. Perhaps a touch bulky, but then again that may have been a result of who was wearing it. Which was a result of many other problems, but this suit/armor deserves credit. Props to the costume department on this one (and only this one aha).

4) George Clooney
We almost all agree he made/makes a perfect Bruce Wayne. His attempt at Batman? Well, what if it was a different time? Different Director? Different Script? No Nipples? I think there would be praise for Clooney. And, for his Bruce Wayne, he makes the list.

3) Nightwi...er..Robin's Costume
Nipples aside, the intial costume was spot on, and visually great. Although still playing Robin, it gave a taste of Grayson's future persona, Nightwing. Sans cape of course.

2) Alfred
The late Michael Gough was really the cornerstone of this franchise. Along with Commissioner Gordon, were the only characters to appear in all 4 installments. Unlike Gordon though, Alfred was an intricate part of the stories, or at least revelant, and although the story was weak in "Batman & Robin", Gough made it work.

1) Batman Begins
Hey, if this movie didn't suck so bad, Hollywood wouldn't have known that it was time for a change. Stories and Direction come first. Without it, it doesn't matter who's starring, high failure rate. That change came in form of Batman Begins, and the trilogy it was apart of. And to steal a quote, "For That, We Thank You!".

Stay Nerdy!

Why Nerds And Geeks Should Honor Canada

Perhaps "honor" is the wrong word to use, or maybe I am acting the stereotype of a Canadian and being modest ahaha But, seriously though even as a Canuck Nerd, I find myself thanking my country for some of these people.
Some are iconic, some were part of things that "failed" box-office wise, none the less all these Canadians were/are part of Nerd history on the big and small screens.

Anna Paquin

She is "Rogue" in the X-Men movies, and is "Sookie Stackhouse" on True Blood. Not a fan? Oscar winner at the age of 11, so props must be given.

Stephen Amell

Amell is Oliver Queen (Green Arrow) on The CW's "Arrow". Season 2 premieres this coming Wednesday (Oct. 9th). 

Ryan Reynolds

Despite the reviews or the box-office numbers, Reynolds has portrayed Green Lantern Hal Jordan in 2011's "Green Lantern" and Deadpool aka Wade Wilson in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" in 2009.

Ellen Page

Ellen has been in the X-Men movie saga as Katherine "Kitty" Pryde or Shadowcat for you mutants out there. Plus, she's Ellen Page....you're welcome.

Keanu Reeves

All jokes aside, John Constantine in 2005's "Constantine". Oh, and I guess there was also that other small time role in The Matrix trilogy ahahaha He's Neo *censored*'s!!

Jim Carrey

Known for so many characters and roles from a range of movies, but his roles as Stanley Ipkiss in 1994's "The Mask", The Riddler in "Batman Forever" (1995) and most recently, Col. Stars And Stripes in this years "Kick-Ass 2".

Laura Vandervoort

You may notice that your current drooling pattern is the same as when you watched televisions "Smallville". That is because she was Kara-El/Kara Kent aka Supergirl on the hit series. You're very welcome.

Seth Rogan

Okay, maybe we owe the world an apology for this, but then again he was the Green Hornet and we were not in 2011's "Green Hornet".

Michael J. Fox

Pretty sure he's an American citizen now, but he's Canadian born regardless, oh and he was also Marty McFly in the classic "Back To The Future" trilogy.

Dan Aykroyd

Co-Created, co-wrote and starred as Ray Stantz in both "Ghostbusters" movies and is willing to make more unlike a certain American (we are lookin' at you Bill).

Rick Moranis

Probably not his "biggest" roles but at the same time kind of were. Louis Tully and well The Keymaster (when possessed) in the "Ghostbusters" films. And was great as Dark Helmet in "Spaceballs" (1987).

Kristin Kreuk

Kristin was Lana Lang in televisions hit show "Smallville". As well as Chun-Li in 2009's "Street Fighter: The Legend Of Chun-Li". And would possibly make a good Catwoman if ever cast to play her.

Nathan Fillion

Nathan has voiced the character in DC's animated movies, and is many peoples choice to play the live screen version of Green Lantern Hal Jordan. He also played lead in televisions "Firefly" and the movie "Serenity" (2005) as Capt. Malcolm Reynolds.

Erica Durance

Erica portrayed the iconic character Lois Lane, and some other characters while possessed on televisions "Smallville". And she was Wonder Woman in a television series that was almost given the "green light".

Aaron Ashmore

Another alumni of televisions hit series of yesteryear "Smallville", Aaron played the role of Jimmy Olsen. And is ironically friends with "Superman Returns" (2006) Jimmy Olsen, Sam Huntington. Oh and....

Shawn Ashmore

Aaron's twin brother is Shawn (as you could tell I am sure) who played Eric Summers on a few occasions on "Smallville". Shawn however is better known for portraying Bobby Drake aka Iceman in the X-Men movies.

Cobie Smulders

Best known for her role on televisions "How I Met Your Mother", Cobie however is known for her role as Agent Maria Hill in the blockbuster "The Avengers" (2012) and the characters recurring roles in other movies and television shows related to the film. And yes, I would cast her as Wonder Woman in an instant. Hint hint.

Hayden Christensen

Love or hate him and/or Episodes II and III in the Star Wars saga, bottom line Hayden was/is Anakin Skywalker and Darth frickin' Vader. Even currently in the "upgraded" Ep. IV-VI. Again, Currently.

William Shatner

Like we have done with Star Wars, Canada gets a win in the Star Trek universe with the original Captain James T. Kirk being Canadian born William Shatner.


Honorable mentions include, James Doohan as Scotty in the Star Trek universe and Pamela Anderson (the early years) with the title character in "Barb Wire" (1996).

Although not Nerd-related, we apologize for the likes of Celine Dion and Justin Beiber. Nobody's perfect right?

Stay Nerdy!